Sunday, April 28, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

New study confirms age of oldest footprints in North America

By T.K. Randall
October 8, 2023 · Comment icon 19 comments
Ancient human footprints at White Sands National Park.
These footprints are the real deal. Image Credit: National Park Service
Scientists have confirmed that the footprints at White Sands National Park really are 23,000 years old.
The prints, which made headline news back in 2021, were discovered in layers of soil at the White Sands national park in New Mexico.

The find was deemed particularly significant as, until recently, the available evidence had suggested that humans had first arrived in North America between 11,000 to 13,000 years ago.

At the time, scientists at the US Geological Survey had determined their age by conducting an analysis of tiny seeds that were embedded inside them.

While compelling, this method did not satisfy everyone and now, two years on, the same team is back with another study confirming once and for all that the footprints are as old as believed.
The new study, which offers corroborating findings using multiple dating techniques, dates the prints to between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago at the time of the Last Glacial Maximum.

The discovery could serve to rewrite what we know about the history of modern humans in North America and might even push their arrival on the continent back further still.

"These finds indicate the presence of humans in North America for approximately two millennia during the Last Glacial Maximum south of the migratory barrier created by the ice sheets to the north," the researchers wrote in the original study.

"This timing coincided with a Northern Hemispheric abrupt warming event, Dansgaard-Oeschger event 2, which drew down lake levels and allowed humans and megafauna to walk on newly exposed surfaces, creating tracks that became preserved in the geologic record."

Source: Live Science | Comments (19)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by Abramelin 7 months ago
I don't doubt they found these footprints, but I doubt the photo of these footprints. Here's another article about the find: Further evidence points to footprints in New Mexico being the oldest sign of humans in Americas https://phys.org/news/2023-10-evidence-footprints-mexico-oldest-humans.html And then look at the photo in the article:
Comment icon #11 Posted by Still Waters 7 months ago
The following video is broadcast-quality video of the fossilized footprints at White Sands National Park. Audio is not provided, request for audio for specific clips can be made by emailing. The videos below are in the public domain, not copyrighted, and is designed as B roll footage. However, please credit as "Courtesy of the National Park Service." https://www.nps.gov/whsa/learn/nature/footprintsmedia.htm The link contains several videos.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 7 months ago
Hi Piney. My thinking goes like this: If they found those footprints in New Mexico that are 20,000 years old, can we now think that the humans crossed the land bridge much earlier than that? It seems logical to me.  Have a good one, bud
Comment icon #13 Posted by Piney 7 months ago
I always thought they skirted the coast in boats coming from somewhere around the Korean Peninsula judging by the genetic evidence.
Comment icon #14 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 7 months ago
Thank you for showing how it can be that some Bigfoots have more toes than others
Comment icon #15 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 7 months ago
Well that one was a bit of a surprise. I still think that Beringa was the way in but the humans never went east, and their settlements were all on the bridge. Just a guess. Then, of course, that evidence was lost later on. Do you recall the American DNA specialist that demonstrated that the Indians of North America came from a specific Siberian tribe?    
Comment icon #16 Posted by Piney 7 months ago
Beringia was more of a small continent than a bridge.  Native Americans are related to almost all Paleo-Siberians including the Manchu, Koreans and Japanese. Your thinking of the Athapaskans/ Apache/ Navajo being related to a specific tribe in Siberia. They crossed long after Beringia was under water. 
Comment icon #17 Posted by NCC1701 7 months ago
It is a nuclear test site.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Antigonos 7 months ago
Boats make a lot more sense than coming via the land bridge. Crossing Beringia, especially with the elderly and little children looking for an ice free corridor between towering glaciers and surviving the journey to below the ice line to southern NA, then on to CA and SA isn’t likely. The whole “following the hunt” hypothesis is outdated.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Piney 7 months ago
I'd like to add the Algic languages are maritime. 


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles