Saturday, February 8, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Creatures, Myths & Legends > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Creatures, Myths & Legends

Scientists analyze cameras used to capture the Cottingley Fairies

By T.K. Randall
July 29, 2024 · Comment icon 19 comments
Cottingley Fairies
One of the original images of the Cottingley Fairies. Image Credit: Leeds University Library / Elsie Wright
In 1917, two young girls claimed to have photographed real-life fairies in a small village in England.
Elsie Wright and Frances Griffiths - two young cousins who would often play next to a stream at the bottom of their garden - repeatedly claimed that they had seen fairies there.

To prove it, Elsie borrowed her father's camera and the girls set about capturing some photographs.

To everyone's surprise, the pair had managed to produce a set of very convincing (for the time) images showing what appeared to be actual fairies, often with one of the girls sitting beside them.

The images were so convincing, in fact, that they quickly went public and became headline news.

Many believed the fairies to be real, including author and spiritualist Sir Arthur Conan Doyle who included the photos in a magazine article he'd written.

The mystery of the Cottingley fairies would go on to endure for over 60 years until finally, in 1983, the two cousins admitted that the photographs had been faked using cut-out illustrations from a book.
Both, however, remained adamant that they had genuinely seen fairies at the bottom of the garden.

Now, more than 100 years after the photographs were taken, scientists have conducted a new analysis of the cameras that the girls had used to take them.

The research involved using brand new state-of-the-art CT scanners capable of imaging detail down to just seven microns - the equivalent of the width of a strand of spider silk.

Despite the high level of detail, however, nothing unusual could be found.

"Of course, we didn't find any fairies but I think we did find a little bit of magic - in that these scanners show how we can now look inside objects without disturbing them and see a level of detail that is unsurpassed," said Professor Andrew Wilson of the University of Bradford.

"Through scanning these objects, we can show the inner workings of how analogue photography works - and the materials which go into making a camera."

"It's really exciting to be able to see new details inside our objects using the cutting-edge facilities next door to us at the University of Bradford."

Source: Mail Online | Comments (19)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by the13bats 6 months ago
As you see I got a bit too into this case, not because of the surface but the extra layers. I dig the case of the Minnesota ice man in the same way, it was a hoax but it has a lot of layers and unanswered questions.
Comment icon #11 Posted by smokeycat 6 months ago
Here is the Arthur C. Clarke's World of Strange Powers episode if anyone is interested. Lined up at the 8:29 mark.  
Comment icon #12 Posted by the13bats 6 months ago
Thank you! I was just too lazy feeling poorly to go grab it, great episodebi have it on SSD, l love the unexplained ghost segment.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 6 months ago
I understand I am the same way sometimes my friend.
Comment icon #14 Posted by the13bats 6 months ago
Another case I liked was naree pons, I think it was my first post here... I don't think the story was true I believe these are artists created but I want to know how, I've made gaffs these are delightful.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 6 months ago
I went to your old post and those are certainly interesting looking creations, have you ever determined how they made?
Comment icon #16 Posted by the13bats 6 months ago
No, I have not figured it out, I'm very OCD so in a case of a gaff how much will it be examined, you know does it need a skeleton in case it's x-rayed, Most such gaffs are in a no touch can't get too close display and just have to look at them. Back stories are of course taken at face value, if I had my guess the naree pons are natural hide of some type, it could be rather dark like some sort of fetus, they still sell real shrunken heads on feebay, they are real as in made of goat skin formed on hot positive bucks, the hair is trimmed to look like beards, mustaches etc. The naree could be some... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by smokeycat 6 months ago
Never heard of gaff being used like that. In the UK the term gaff is a slang word for house/home but can also be used to mean mistake.
Comment icon #18 Posted by the13bats 6 months ago
I use gaff as a broad term for made up props used in sideshows it might be real creatures like a Fiji mermaid or all fake like pigmy mud people, pickled punks are real specimens in jars which are real, if we have a real unique creature say a two headed snake then it's not to me a gaff but a specimen however I do see some place anything sideshow under the "gaff" umbrella. The Peru alien mummys would be gaffs.  
Comment icon #19 Posted by jethrofloyd 6 months ago
I like this fairies story, but it's as real as the Patterson - Gimlin' bigfoot.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles