Saturday, April 18, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Spirituality > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Spirituality

Turin shroud was laid on a sculpture, not a real body, study finds

By T.K. Randall
August 1, 2025 · Comment icon 10 comments
Turin Shroud
Image: Turin Shroud
Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 / Dianelos Georgoudis
Researchers have looked at the way fabric falls when placed over a body to reveal new details about the shroud.
Believed by many to be the actual burial cloth of Jesus himself, the Turin Shroud - which is today situated in the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist in Turin, Italy - has long been the subject of intense scrutiny, controversy and debate.

A significant number of researchers have made conflicting claims about the shroud, with some hailing it as authentic and others suggesting that it is either a forgery or not the shroud of Jesus at all.

Now, according to a new study, the shroud was most likely not created by being placed on an actual human body but was instead produced by being placed over a low-relief sculpture.

This finding comes courtesy of Brazilian 3D digital designer Cicero Moraes - an expert at historical face reconstructions - who used computer simulations to show how cloth drapes over a human body.
"The image on the Shroud of Turin is more consistent with a low-relief matrix," he told Live Science.

"Such a matrix could have been made of wood, stone or metal and pigmented (or even heated) only in the areas of contact, producing the observed pattern."

By contrast, if the shroud were placed on a real body, the image on it would have been much more stretched out than what we actually see on it today.

While Moraes tends to favor the idea that the shroud was still created within a funerary context, it is clear from his findings that the imprint was not the result of it being placed over Jesus' body.

"It is plausible to consider that artists or sculptors with sufficient knowledge could have created such a piece, either through painting or low relief," he wrote.

Source: Live Science | Comments (10)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Singularity-1 9 months ago
I don't believe the shroud covered Jesus body because the ures describe his burial covering being two parts; one for the body and another, or two, for the head, not a single piece of cloth. It is written he folded both parts separately, (which is kind of a Miraculous thing to be added, as if anticipating the future shroud controversy.) But neither do I believe this explanation for the shrouds existence, unless or until the actual sculpture used to create it is identified.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Ell 9 months ago
Jesus never had a body.   So this cloth may have been used by a sculptor as a temporary dust cover for his sculpture? Maybe prior to revealing it to the customer and public?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Cho Jinn 9 months ago
Cite?
Comment icon #4 Posted by Ell 9 months ago
Ell!
Comment icon #5 Posted by Antigonos 9 months ago
Since it’s been carbon dated definitely to the Crusader period this is one of the hypotheses that actually makes sense. We don’t know who exactly the image represents, but since all the art and architecture of the royal family of Jerusalem was destroyed when the Muslims retook the holy city, including their tombs in the church of the Holy Sepulchre,  perhaps the image comes from a funerary monument that depicted one of the kings of Jerusalem. Or it could have come from a normal statue that stood somewhere in the royal grounds. Or even from elsewhere in Jerusalem, possibly taken from a p... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by cormac mac airt 9 months ago
I would have to question that as the picture on the Shroud of Turin appears to be more of a European type than anything Middle Eastern in origin and Jesus was definitely Middle Eastern.  cormac
Comment icon #7 Posted by Antigonos 9 months ago
I’m saying it represents a European. Whether one of the Crusader kings or a member of one of the military religious orders.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Freez1 9 months ago
The technique he described to achieve the image on the cloth I don’t see anyone doing to produce a forgery that long ago but I could be wrong. The idea of it being the cloth that covered Jesus has always made more sense to me. But how many different countries claim to have nails or pieces of the cross?
Comment icon #9 Posted by Djehuty 9 months ago
I never believed the shroud was real. Not with that classic European on it. I could well imagine that it's an imprint of a sculpture. But there will always be people who believe it's real, no matter how many good arguments you put forward against it.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Berwen 9 months ago
Just number 5 on the list of the worlds greatest hoaxes


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles