Tuesday, February 21, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Colonization requires at least 10,000 people


Posted on Wednesday, 9 April, 2014 | Comment icon 53 comments

Humans may one day live on other worlds. Image Credit: NASA
A new study has calculated how many people it would take to viably populate another planet.
In the future we may see generational ships heading out across the stars on voyages lasting thousands of years in the hopes of finding new Earth-like worlds to colonize.

Back in 2002, anthropologist John Moore calculated that such a ship would need at least 150 people in order to survive a 2,000-year trip across the cosmos, but is this really enough ? A more recent study conducted by Cameron Smith or Portland State University has cast doubt on this conclusion and suggests that a more realistic number to ensure survival would be between 10,000 and 40,000 people.

These figures were reached by taking in to account the necessary genetic diversity of a population, the possibility of disease or disaster along the way and the likely growth rate from natural births.

"I did this study to materially help in putting together the millions of puzzle pieces that will be required to allow humanity to spread out from our earthly cradle," he said.

Source: Popular Mechanics | Comments (53)

Tags: Planet, Population, Colonization


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #44 Posted by Frank Merton on 11 April, 2014, 9:24
The only thing keeping the human species from colonizing the galaxy in a few million years would be either our own weaknesses (lack of foresight as we see above or self-destruction) or an encounter with ET, which would make us go slow if at all.
Comment icon #45 Posted by DieChecker on 11 April, 2014, 14:41
It maybe b.s. to you but its true,have a nice day. We've already left the solar system. Voyager.... You said "no chance" which is wrong. The chance is small, but it exists. The technology exists. Like Frank said, it is only humans not wanting to go which is the limitation. And look how many signed up to go die on Mars.
Comment icon #46 Posted by StarMountainKid on 11 April, 2014, 14:58
I'm not sure it would be a good thing for humans to colonize the galaxy.
Comment icon #47 Posted by DieChecker on 11 April, 2014, 15:01
I'm not sure it would be a good thing for humans to colonize the galaxy. For humans? Or the galaxy?
Comment icon #48 Posted by StarMountainKid on 11 April, 2014, 15:12
For humans?Or the galaxy? For the safety and mental health of all the other life-forms in the galaxy.
Comment icon #49 Posted by BarnabasCollins on 11 April, 2014, 15:48
Setting aside the technical difficulties for such a trip, one would have to keep human factors in mind. The first issue is a moral one. The first generation would all presumably be volunteers. However, the second and subsequent generations would essentially be cons, having had no say in the decision to leave Earth. This could lead to the second issue. Subsequent generations might decide not to go along with the agenda into which they were born. They might decide to scrub the mission and return to Earth or otherwise change the original goal in some form or fashion. Then there is the human facto... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by stevemagegod on 11 April, 2014, 16:24
The human race at one point in time survived a near extinction event which wiped out everyone on the planet except for an estimated 10,000 people which have survived to this day.
Comment icon #51 Posted by taniwha on 12 April, 2014, 13:46
The human race at one point in time survived a near extinction event which wiped out everyone on the planet except for an estimated 10,000 people which have survived to this day. Yes if you stayed on earth you still have a fighting chance at least...
Comment icon #52 Posted by Azznerak the Black on 13 April, 2014, 18:24
The last thing this Galaxy needs is for the infection of humanity to spread. With humanity comes their laughable morals, religious views, and self-centered attitudes. Unless humanity wakes up, which would take the eradication of at least 95% of your population, the human virus will continue to infect this planet and this planet alone. Humans cannot cooperate with each other long enough to establish any viable project for colonization. Damn Skippy.
Comment icon #53 Posted by rodentraiser on 15 April, 2014, 3:11
How many people would it take? In the case of the Duggars, only two. Yes, I missed my meds and I'm being snarky tonight.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
'Tully monster' mystery continues to endure
2-20-2017
A peculiar prehistoric discovery has left scientists scratching their heads for more than five decades.
Ship set to be deliberately trapped in ice
2-20-2017
Scientists are planning to sail a research vessel to the Arctic so it can get stuck in the ice on purpose.
NASA proposes redefining the word 'planet'
2-20-2017
The move, if successful, could mean that our own solar system actually has more than 100 planets in it.
SpaceX Cape Canaveral launch is a success
2-19-2017
The private space firm has successfully launched a Falcon 9 rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
Featured book
 
By Guy Lyon Playfair
A look at the story of Peggy Hodgson and her four children who, between 1977 and 1979, were at the center of one of the most terrifying poltergeist cases ever documented.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
'Spider Boy' contortionist
Posted 2-20-2017 | 2 comments
Teenager Mohammed Alsheikh performed 38 full body spins while maintaining a chest stand.
 
Slow motion football explosion
Posted 2-19-2017 | 0 comments
What happens when you over-inflate a football ? The Slo Mo Guys investigate.
 
Long-term space travel and isolation
Posted 2-18-2017 | 1 comment
Not everyone is cut out for the isolation of traveling long distances through space.
 
Humphead parrotfish
Posted 2-17-2017 | 1 comment
These bizarre-looking 1.5-meter-long fish can use their teeth to turn coral in to a fine sand.
 
Catching lightning in a bottle
Posted 2-16-2017 | 0 comments
Is it possible to catch lightning in a bottle ? Adam Savage investigates.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Saved by a stranger
2-7-2017 | Green River Wyoming
 
Spooky sense
2-4-2017 | India
 
Ghost car
2-4-2017 | Chicago, IL, USA
 
Mysterious powder
2-4-2017 | USA, North Carolina
 
Puerto Rico UFO sighting
2-4-2017 | Sabana Grande, Puerto Rico
 
Phantom vehicle
1-6-2017 | Ramer, United States
 
True ghost stories
1-6-2017 | Southern California
 
Floating tiles
1-6-2017 | Chewelah, Washington
 
A haunting in Northern California
12-28-2016 | Northern California
 
Strange creature in South Africa
12-28-2016 | South Africa, Hoedspruit.
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ