Saturday, April 18, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

Demi Moore discusses Roswell and aliens with Stephen Colbert

By T.K. Randall
November 17, 2025 · Comment icon 31 comments
The International UFO Museum and Research Center in Roswell, New Mexico
Image: Gray Aliens with Saucer at The UFO Museum, Roswell
Credit: Kimble Young / CC BY-SA 2.0 (adapted)
The actress, who was born in Roswell, recently sat down for an interview on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.
During her recent appearance on the show to promote new TV series Landman, it wasn't long before the conversation turned to the topic of UFOs, not only because Moore is a Roswell native but also because Colbert happens to have a keen interest in the phenomenon as well.

The town, which is situated in New Mexico, is well known for its infamous UFO incident which allegedly saw an alien spacecraft crash-land nearby before being hushed up by the military.

"Something definitely happened," said Moore. "But when I was a kid, it was never spoken about. Never. It just was not ever ever talked about, not even in passing. It was as if it was a secret."

When Colbert pressed her on what she meant by 'something happened', she added:

"I don't know. Well, you know, the largest landing strip in America is in Roswell, so there's a lot of testing that goes on."
"Legally, you can't say anything or they'll take you out," Colbert joked.

"It's possible," Moore replied.

The actress then asked Colbert what it was about the topic of aliens he found so fascinating.

"The possibility there are aliens, or a branch of the military that's been putting out these videos of unexplainable pill-shaped things that go into the water and come out and go from like 0 to 6,000 miles an hour with absolutely no g-force impact - I mean, what?" he said.

"I am not the one with the problem."

You can check out the full conversation for yourself below.



Source: Yahoo! News | Comments (31)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #22 Posted by Dejarma 5 months ago
someone unlawfully driving away with a little is a crime! the little girl would be missing! or am i just stupid!?
Comment icon #23 Posted by Dejarma 5 months ago
yeah, good point, but I feel what's being discussed here is a little different. For a start, eye witness accounts of something in the sky is not witnessing a crime. Plus reports of mass sightings are normally just stories in themselves IMO. Anyways, what do I know!? ?
Comment icon #24 Posted by Hazzard 5 months ago
  Apples and oranges. Courts and science do not operate on the same rules because they do not have the same goals. A court has to reach a verdict about a one-off event that cannot be repeated, so it uses eyewitness testimony even when the evidence is thin. The system is built to settle a dispute, not to uncover universal truth. Science is the opposite. Scientific claims must be repeatable and testable by independent observers. You do not take anyones word for it. If the event cannot be repeated and the conditions cannot be tested, you cannot build a scientific conclusion on it. The legal syst... [More]
Comment icon #25 Posted by Trelane 5 months ago
Yes, yes it is. That is irrelevant
Comment icon #26 Posted by theloniusmonk 5 months ago
I do totally get this. I'm more questioning whether the adherance to such a 'scientifically provable' dogma is kind of not what this forum is about to some degree?  Most of us come here to have our fascination with the 'other' titillated - that's surely why this forum exists isn't it? Of course it is crucial to challange complete nonsense (crap generated by AI, complete lies etc), but I don't understand why (here on UM) the need to apply the rigorous scientific method to any and all reports of anything unusual. So what if it can't be proved, replicated or understood?  
Comment icon #27 Posted by Dejarma 5 months ago
What is this 'it' you're referring to? I'm assuming 'it' is a story told. ...... 'it' could also refer to solid physical data- but there isn't any.. is there??
Comment icon #28 Posted by Hazzard 5 months ago
Not everyone here approaches things the same way - some of us are more scientifically minded, and others come from a totally different angle. That mix of perspectives is part of what makes UM what it is.
Comment icon #29 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps 5 months ago
we don't know that. hr could be offering her a ride home.  but if he attacks the little girl and kills her then the testimony of the person who witnessed the pickup would surely be very valuable. 
Comment icon #30 Posted by Golden Duck 5 months ago
UFO reports aren't sworn testimony in that sense.  It's information that would usually be rated as F6 on the Admiralty Scale.
Comment icon #31 Posted by Dejarma 5 months ago
oh ok then


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles